The Church of Kharma Futures

The Rev's views on politics, events,faith, and the world. All content copyright Church of Kharma Future 2007-2015 All rights Reserved

Radical Christianity Emerging, Emulating Radical Islam

Posted by deaconkharmafuture1 on April 2, 2008

Not many have missed the disgusting racial vitriol spewed by the Reverend Jeremiah Wright. Not many have missed the “repudiation” from Barack Obama. What is it exactly that this represents and what does it mean to Christianity and to the United States? I will seek to analyze the meaning.

First, I must preface this document with what Christianity means overall to the non-radical. Jesus came for souls and yes, to end slavery. What’s that you say? He came to end slavery? Well yes, but careful now, lest we lose his message in this one statement. Jesus came to free man (all of man folks) from the slavery of sin. No more than this slavery of sin, no less. Jesus was specifically ignored, as the messiah, by the Jewish religious leaders because they expected, specifically, a conqueror and political messiah. What they misinterpreted, in the opinion of the Christian faith, is the nature of the prophecy and the nature of the messiah.

Now understanding this nature of The Messiah in the Christian Faith, we understand that indeed the Jews were subjugated by the Romans, yet Jesus made no attempt to address this. Jesus specified he came to open up the kingdom of God through his sacrifice. He did not come to free physically, the Israelites. Do we then understand, now, the reason some Jewish religious leaders helped to crucify him?

If Jesus did not physically free the Israelites, then should we consider Jesus specifically addressing the issue of the subjugation of the Africans? Would Jesus address this or would he again be concerned with their immortal souls? Is there again a misunderstanding of why Jesus came? What would Jesus say in this day and age about a past subjugation that no longer exists? I strongly doubt Jesus would come here with that specific endeavor in mind. Why then would a man who represents and purports to repeat the words of God, and his son Jesus Christ, have the audacity to hope that Jesus would speak these words? As a spokesman for the word of God and Jesus Christ, he should then be concerned as Jesus was, for the immortal souls of his “flock”. Is the hateful language something Jesus would use? Jesus was the one who spoke repeatedly of forgiveness. The messiah addressed his disciples on turning the other cheek and forgiveness numerous times. Jesus spoke the words “forgive them” while dangling from a cross bleeding profusely.

How then do we get to this point in a Christian church where hate and divisive language are cheered on by the congregation? Remember, the pastor, or priest, passes on the words of the Lord. Are these the words of the Lord? No they are not the words of the Lord, and as a matter of fact Mark 13:5 says “ And Jesus answering them, began to say, ‘Take heed lest any one may lead you astray’ ”. Even further in Mak 13, Jesus says to his disciples, “And then if any man shall say to you, Lo, here is Christ; or, lo, he is there; believe him not: For false Christs and false prophets shall rise, and shall shew signs and wonders, to seduce, if it were possible, even the elect”. The words of Wright are misleading, sure enough, and not of the Lord. Make no mistake about this. Making these statements in church and in the name of God is directly mentioned when Jesus mentions “false Prophets”.

Sermons, like those of the “Reverend” Wright, sound more like the vitriol and hate spewed from the Blind Sheik or speeches videotaped and sent out from Osama Bin Laden. The same hate for other groups of people can be found right in the radical mosques around the world. Are we seeing an emergence of a Radical Christianity much like the Wahhabi sect of Islam? What started as a radical group has spread throughout the world and throughout the Muslim world, like a cancer. Will we hail the days of Reverend Wright as the beginning of Radical Christianity? Will we then see your “typical white person” assaulted on the streets or blown up with car bombs in retaliation for “creating the AIDS virus to kill blacks”?

With divisive and vitriolic words from what the black community hails as its prominent leaders, what are we to think of the black community? Is this feeling much the same we have for Islam? Without those specifically speaking out against the hatred, then do we consider silence, agreement? Do we not consider the same for Islam? Hymie town, Zionists, Jewish being referred to as the diamond merchants, white greed, typical white people, and white conspiracy are all things we hear from Reverend Al Sharpton, Reverend Jesse Jackson, Islamic minister Farrakhan, and Reverend Jeremiah Wright. So exactly when do we consider what the real thoughts of the black community might be?

Jesus spoke of love and forgiveness. Osama Bin Laden, Muqtada Al-Sadr, “Reverends” Jackson, Wright, Sharpton, and Farrakahn, all speak of division and anger at past ills, and propagate hate and ill will. I see no difference between all of these people, except one, the Lord Jesus Christ. I find myself listening to the words from these “Christian” pulpits and ask myself the well recognized words, “what would Jesus do?”. I am surprised that these latter named “Christian men of God” do not seem to consider what Jesus would say or do. I do notice one other difference between the Lord and these other men. Christ had no personal wealth or possessions, yet these men who spout hate then foment anger, more hate, and riots, all live in houses like those the “rich white men” live in or have extremely large bank accounts. Wright speaks of white greed, yet when reverend Wright lives in a million dollar home with a 10 million dollar line of credit, I would say that is rich and a bit greedy. Note Wright’s attack on “the pursuit of middleclassness”, and his far surpassing it on the way to riches. Perhaps the hate and division is a means to an end for wealth or power, neither of which Jesus sought. Perhaps the black community should consider the words of God and his son Jesus Christ for themselves, rather than be led like lemmings, over the cliffs of hate, fear, anger, and envy by those who seek personal gain on the backs of their congregations.

What this means for the Christian church and the United States is division, racial violence, and possibly a future for Christianity that bears even more of a resemblance to Islam and the violence done in its name. This is in a stage that should be addressed before it reaches the epidemic magnitude that radical Islam has reached. I implore the congregations of churches and the people of the United States to ask themselves what means to an end the hate spouted from religious leaders brings. Who benefits and who suffers? What would Jesus say, folks? Remember that the next time you attend church. It’s a litmus test I think we all should apply.


6 Responses to “Radical Christianity Emerging, Emulating Radical Islam”

  1. james said

    You wrote: “Osama Bin Laden, Muqtada Al-Sadr, “Reverends” Jackson, Wright, Sharpton, and Farrakahn, all speak of division and anger at past ills, and propagate hate and ill will. I see no difference between all of these people, except one, the Lord Jesus Christ. ”

    This is the key–each of the men represent groups that have broken the 2nd Commandment, creating for themselves a god of their own understanding, an idol–each one different from the other. They try to create “tolerance,” each in the name of his false gods (Isalm and Nation of Islam do not even recognize the same “Allah”!) but fail to accomplish it because there is no Prince of Peace for them. They have broken the 2nd commandment, as part of the domino effect where failing to keep the 1st also prevents them from keeping the 3rd. Think about the implications of that—those who take God’s name upon themselves and misrepresent Him—“For the Lord will not leave Him unpunished who takes His name in vain.” (Exodus 20:7)

    Consider the following by Ray Comfort, from The Evidence Bible:

    “Man has used religion for political gain. Nazi Germany had ‘God with us’ engraved in German on the belts of Nazi soldiers. America said, ‘Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition.’ The law may even allow you to start the Christian Nazi Party, if you so desire. You can become a “reverend” for a few dollars through the tabloid classifieds and then further your political agenda with the world’s blessing, no matter how much it smears the name of Christ.

    Jesus tells us in John 16:2,3 that there will be some who, in their error, commit atrocities and murder in the name of God: ‘The time is coming that whosoever kills you will think that he does God service.’ However, He informs us that these are not true believers: ‘And these things will they do to you, because they have not known the Father, nor me.’ (See also 1 John 3:15.)

    Jesus told His followers to love their enemies. So if a man puts a knife into someone’s back in the name of Christianity [or “God” for that matter], something obviously isn’t right. If we human beings can detect it, how much more will God? He will deal with it on Judgment Day.”

    The Lord Jesus Christ was displayed publicly on the cross to pay the penalty for sin and rose again three days later that we might be justified by faith (Romans 3:21-26). Through that payment, those who repent of sin (sin = breaking God’s moral law, see 1 John 3:4) are delivered from the kingdom of darkness to the kingdom of light (Ephesians 2:1-10). For those who repent He set free from the bondage of sin, who in turn look forward to the day we will be delivered from the presence of sin!

    Robert J. Priest and Alvaro K. Nieves have edited a book called, “This Side of Heaven: Race, Ethnicity, and Christian Faith.” Part III is titled, “Using and Abusing the Bible in Ethnic and Racial Contexts.” Chapter 10 of this section explores the Theology of Hate. This book is worth the read.

    Thank you for your kind consideration.

  2. […] April 4, 2008 by revkharma I wanted to post a quick recognition here in this space. Look at the comment to ” Radical Christianity” […]

  3. foundersfreedom said

    I attend an A/G church in an urban neighborhood. The pastor is white and half the congregation. I know lots of the blacks in our church voted for Obama because he was black. The pastor said as much as he could to “vote the Bible.” The churches in most urban areas, even those like TD Jakes’ have failed to stand for righteousness (not to be confused with Republicanism) at all costs. They have taken a political rather than spiritual position and much of their flock is paying the price.

  4. deaconkharmafuture1 said

    James said it above pretty well, and I believe it, that those that take on the mantle and misrepresent, well, their time will come and misleading a group of people… well it says all that needs to be said-
    “Think about the implications of that—those who take God’s name upon themselves and misrepresent Him—’For the Lord will not leave Him unpunished who takes His name in vain.’ (Exodus 20:7)”
    We must all do our part to remove from ourselves and our congregations the cancer that these men represent.

    Stand for righteousness and those around you will see the difference. They will know you by the fruits you bear. We know what fruits these “pastors” bear.

    Thanks for the comments and stick around! God bless!

  5. foundersfreedom said

    I didn’t notice how old this post was, though it doesn’t matter.
    Glad I found you.

  6. deaconkharmafuture1 said

    Glad you found us and if I forgot to say it before, WELCOME! 🙂

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: