The Church of Kharma Futures

The Rev's views on politics, events,faith, and the world. All content copyright Church of Kharma Future 2007-2015 All rights Reserved

Politics of Distraction

Posted by revkharma on July 24, 2009

So, the last question of Obama’s  ‘Health care ‘ press conference changed everything. In what almost seems to be a planted question the president was asked to address the recent arrest of Harvard Professor Gates. The Great and Powerful Obama began by admitting his own bias, then waded in and called the actions of the police ‘stupid’.  Predictably, this has once more put the debate on racial division on the front page of newspapers and top discussion topic of many news programs. See, it’s all about race, and if we believe the template the only reason this happened is because the cop in question was white and the professor black.

Let’s dig a little and see if this holds water.

First, any time Obama takes a question there has got to be a political calculus involved. By taking that one, and responding the way he has, Obama has been able to shift discussion away from his losing performance on nationalizing health care, andshift it to another topic. Reviewing his answers that night one can see he simply has no answers to any questions. His health care plan is a mess, and it is likely to fail if it is examined in any detail. He stumbled and mumbled, with as many ” umms’ and ahhs’ as real replies to questions. He indicted doctors, claiming they are ‘removing tonsils for higher profit’ rather than treating allergies and sore throats.  He alluded to heart rending letters he reads every day, while saying the discussion should not be about him. The senate has now decided not to vote before Obama’s clear August deadline.

So, what to do? Distract and shift attention. Make it all about race instead of his slipping plan.

The problem here is if you look at what actually happened, this is NOT about race, but about power, wealth and personal privilege.  Gates, while dealing with police  officers on the scene, was calling headquarters, apparently gaining access to ‘the chief’. Once he was arrested, he was able to throw his connections around and have charges dismissed.  If this had been any average American, who would doubt that they would have been processed and charged.  The cops on the scene responded to a call of a possible break in. Accounts and photos of the scene show that the officers on scene were actually a multi racial group. They faced an arrogant and belligerent loudmouth who simply would NOT accept anything other than confrontation. Witnesses say he continued to berate the officer long after the officer tried to disengage.  Gates was then handcuffed and arrested. Afterward he was released, and no charges were lodged against him.  Had that been an ordinary, middle class American, white or black, who had continued to shout and abuse a cop, there surely would have been charges.

Now all the media are discussing the case, the circus, and the statement which President Obama has injected, clearly and intentionally into the whole morass.

I began this essay early Friday morning, and later in the day two events took place. First, the police union in Cambridge staged a press conference to support Sgt Crowley. White House press secretary  and Chief Jester Robert Gibbs at first attempted to portray it as a political battle, stating that ” the FOP endorsed Mccain”.

Shortly after that, Obama descended to the press room and offered one of his now familiar pseudo apologies.  He professed to be stunned that his remarks generated such interest. After allowing that he had ‘failed to properly calibrate his words’ he attempted to make some humorous statements. The fawning press guffawed louder than Ed McMahon listening to a Carson joke fall flat.

Yet listen carefully to his words, and you will see that President Obama has absolutely NOT apologized for his offensive characterization.

In my choice of words, I unfortunately gave the impression that I was maligning the Cambridge Police Department or Sergeant Crowley specifically, I continue to believe, based on what I have heard, that there was an overreaction in pulling Prof. Gates out of his home and to the station. I also continue to believe, based on what I heard, that Prof. Gates probably overreacted as well

This will insure a continued discussion of race, police and most importantly of all, The Great and Powerful Obama. He has made the remarks, and just by stating them has played the race card. He has also refused to actually recant.  He will, through back channels and sotto voce maintain that his credibility with the Community Organizers from which he draws his power. His allies at ACORN will stand by him. And he will avoid the discussion of his major failure to ram the takeover of the US Health care system as quickly as he wanted.

And THAT,  I maintain, is the whole and sole purpose of this.  If Obama had the votes lined up to pass the plan no comments would ever have been made about Gates and the Cambridge PD. This way, he deflects attention until either he finds a back door way to cheat his plan through the system or manages to coerce or buy enough votes to get the disastrous plan through the house.

It is, this time and every time, all about him. Don’t be fooled, this was not a mistake, or a misspeak, or a poor choice of words. He accomplished what he wanted.  Now we have to watch carefully. He’s sent the distraction, we have to wait to see the hidden secret he wants to keep us from seeing.

Keep the Faith

The Rev


2 Responses to “Politics of Distraction”

  1. deaconkharmafuture1 said

    The back door will be through the “budget backdoor”since it cannot be filibustered or blocked.

    One correction for the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue: He was not pulled from his house, he voluntarily followed the cop out of his house on his own two feet and kept flapping his jaws rather than thank the cop for checking up on his house. HE wasn’t “pulled from his house”. His race baiting took place outside where the subsequent arrest was made.

  2. deaconkharmafuture1 said

    No. 1 concern is that lawmakers may use the budget reconciliation process to pass a resolution containing two of Obama’s most important priorities: funding for health care reform and a cap-and-trade plan designed to reduce greenhouse gases. By pushing for reconciliation, Congress would not need the 60 votes to break a filibuster in the Senate. A simple majority in the higher chamber instead could pass a budget resolution.

    Some Blue dogs would allow a continued filibuster rather than have to oppose, openly, the current resident of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue. With a budget reconciliation the filibuster option is off the table, votes would have to be made. Then the machine can swing into gear to bribe and cajole members with the last minute sweetheart amendments that buy the votes, or cajole the members with political blackmail in their districts.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: